Welcome to Mobile Marketer. Skip directly to: main content, navigation, search box.
  • Email this
  • Print
  • ARTICLE TOOLS
    SPONSOR
  • Please click here to learn more!

Receive the latest articles for free. Click here to get the Mobile Marketer newsletters.

Tips on designing mobile Web sites

Len Shneyder

Len Shneyder is director of partner relations and industry communications at Pivotal Veracity

By Len Shneyder

In a world that is big on standards but short on implementation, I'm going to take a firm stand on what appears to be common oversights in the design of mobile Web sites.

During a recent hunt of large brands on the small screen of my smartphone I began to wonder if there was any consensus on the sub-domain or folder nomenclature used by companies to denote a mobile site. This shouldn't come as a surprise when I say I was unable to find any rules. But I did notice some general trends.

Sign up to receive Mobile Marketer Daily. The premier mobile marketing publication. Free!

The most common way of creating a mobile domain or mobile site is to create a sub-domain http://m.widget.com where m=mobile. Other variations included http://mobile.widget.com and http://www.widget.com/mobile and, in one case, http://wireless.widget.com.

All of these variations are perfectly valid and all of them fit into the general structure of "m" as the designation or commonly anticipated designator of a mobile site.

However, think small. Your users are fat-fingering words, names and numbers on those tiny QWERTY keyboards constantly. So what's easier to spell -- m or mobile?

But is there even a need to spell it correctly?

Well-coded Web sites should have the ability to automatically redirect requests from mobile browsers to the appropriate mobile site.

Mobile browsers identify themselves through a user agent string when they issue a request to pull down an HTML page at which point the site should serve up the mobile version if a mobile browser properly identifies itself.

I've run across several large brands that have mobile iterations, but are not automatically serving them up when called from a mobile device. Go the extra mile. It may compel users to return to your site on their desktop if they have a good experience on their handheld.

To make this a trifecta of recommendations let's consider the <title> of your mobile page.

Again the rule of thumb here is short and to the point. Try and avoid pitching your company's core competency in the page's title -- "Widgets.com, the market leader in all things widget."

Do the selling or pitching of services on the site and not in the title, because if someone chooses to bookmark this page the default name of the bookmark is essentially the name contained between the <title></title> tags.

Here's an example of a title that's direct and to the point: <title>CNET Mobile</title>. Facebook's title tag is fairly short but could stand to be shorter: <title>Facebook | Welcome To Facebook</title>. MySpace's title is short but lacks any identifying criteria <title>Member Login</title>.

I doubt that with all my bookmarks that I'd remember Member Login = MySpace when I haphazardly scroll through the list to find something.

There are lots of small nuances to take into consideration.

Mobile presence is about streamlining not only your offering but a user's experience of your mobile presence. Think down the chain of events and how each keystroke represents precious time.

Smartphones are here to help us be more efficient. Don't be the weak link in the chain of the user's mobile experience.

Len Shneyder is director of partner relations and industry communications at Pivotal Veracity, a deliverability services and consultancy provider in Phoenix. Reach him at

 
Related content: Columns, Len Shneyder, Pivotal Veracity, mobile Web sites, mobile marketing, mobile

  • Trackback url: http://www.mobilemarketer.com/cms/trackback/1409-2
  • | Follow us on Twitter |

Comments on "Tips on designing mobile Web sites"

  1. Luke Janssen says:

    July 30, 2008 at 4:12pm

    Hey Paul, .Mobi is not a viable solution for companies, for the simple fact that many squatters have registered the .mobi that company 'x' wants to use. Why buy the .Mobi off whoever is holding it hostage, when you can use the sub-domain?

    I usually advise our clients to just use "m.x" there is no excuse for using "mobile.x" I have to agree with Len on that one. Today I saw www.cinwap.com, a while new URL! who the hell is advising the Cincinnati Enquirer on that one!!?

    The real problem that I am seeing here, which was (and still it) the same in Asia and Europe is that companies are building mobile sites and not rendering them to devices. The biggest culprits are webdesign / tech companies, and Ad agencies (and in particular the agencies). You can't use WURFL (our developers call it "woe-ful"), you need other sources to keep your handset database up to date, as well as the actual handsets for testing. Emulators are not good enough.

    Agencies in particular need to stop telling their clients that they can do mobile and get a mobile company to help them, because blowing up your clients with bad executions is not sustainable. Look at the chase mobile site!... whoever did that should feel ashamed of themselves!

    Phew!...., thats my rant over with!
  2. Paul G says:

    July 29, 2008 at 9:12pm

    Len, what gives? You don't give any mention of .mobi?!

    For those who don't know, .mobi is THE ONLY domain extension specific to mobile web. You can find out more about it at Why.mobi. Lot's of companies and people are using it today so please offer complete info on this in the future.